"The Shack: Where Tragedy Confronts Eternity by William P. Young (Wind Blown Media, 2007, 264 pp) is a New York Times best seller with well over a million copies in print. Literally hundreds of thousands have been blessed by its message, but its message is precisely what calls for scrutiny. Responses to The Shack range from eulogy to heresy..."
Full Review by Norman Geisler here.
Monday, December 08, 2008
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(219)
-
▼
December
(28)
- Missing Gospels and Lost Christianities MP3 Audio ...
- Religious Epistemology MP3 Audio by William Lane C...
- Winner of the Drawing
- The Apologist’s First Question
- Sunday Quote: J.P. Moreland on Christian Philosophy
- Merry Christmas from Apologetics 315
- The Personal Apologetic
- Featured Website: Bible.Logos.com
- Sunday Quote: F.F. Bruce on the New Testament
- William Lane Craig on Richard Dawkins' God Delusio...
- Featured Podcast: Bible Study Podcasts
- How Accurate is the Bible? MP3 Audio by Ken Boa
- Apologetics Methodologies Past and Present MP3 Aud...
- What is Inerrancy? William Lane Craig MP3 Audio
- Gary Habermas & Craig Evans Discuss the Jesus Book...
- Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Christianity
- Ken Boa on Miracles MP3 Audio
- The Reliability of the New Testament Text MP3 Audi...
- Promote Apologetics 315
- Jesus Never Existed? Resources for Study
- The Shack: Helpful or Heretical? by Norman Geisler
- Sunday Quote: Blaise Pascal on Three Types of People
- Phil Fernandes vs. Robert Price Debate MP3 Audio -...
- Judaism and Baha'i MP3 Audio
- Dr. Phil Fernandes Comprehensive MP3 Audio Feeds
- Two Dozen (or so) Theistic Arguments by Alvin Plan...
- Relativism by Greg Koukl MP3 Audio
- Apologetics 315 Podcast Feed Now Available!
-
▼
December
(28)
5 comments :
Thanks, I was looking for some biblical, scholarly reviews I could trust on this book. I know I have used several of Geisler's books at MBI, so I appreciate what he had to say about The Shack.
After hearing of all the attention this book was getting, I read it for myself. I found myself heartily agreeing with Geisler's point of view.
The Shack had no scripture in it, and emphasized personal experience over written revelation. Seminary education was portrayed as useless and even harmful. The portrayal of God and the dialogue attributed to Him were cringeworthy.
I think the success of this book shows the lack of discernment among the church, yet does reveal a true hunger for a relationship that is beyond just dry orthodoxy. It is unfortunate that when people reject dry liturgy, their pendulum tends to swing so far in the other direction.
It is too bad that Norman Geisler is unable to see and interpret things outside of the grid he is trapped inside of. Whether or not Norman worships the God of the Bible is unclear to me, but what seems perfectly clear is that Norman worships the Bible. The single biggest idol in the history of the Christian faith is the Bible. God is not a genie trapped inside that book, with shackles and puffy pants, waiting to answer every question with a Bible verse.
The book explained the trinity and human and God relationship in a simple and down to earth way with out all the techno language that turns young people off - using a story that quite frankly I loved. I know some who have never cracked a bible who are now looking deeper. Why throw cold water on a book that could lead millions to search for a deeper understanding who may turn to the bible after reading this book? Makes me think of these "technical scholars" a lot like Jesus did in Matthew 23:13 "Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the door of the kingdom of heaven in people's faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to."
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.