The following transcript is from an Apologetics 315 interview with Matt Slick. Original audio here. Transcript index here. If you enjoy transcripts, please consider supporting, which makes this possible.
BA: Hello, this is Brian Auten, of Apologetics 315. Today’s interview is with Matthew Slick of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry, more popularly known as CARM, found at www.carm.org.
Matt started CARM in October of 1995 to respond to many of the false teachings of the cults on the internet, when it first began. Now it has grown to be one of the largest apologetics resources online. Matt hosts Faith and Reason Radio, week nights in the Boise area and on the internet and that is also podcasted as the CARM Radio Program.
The purpose of our interview today is to get to know a little bit more about Matt, his ministry with CARM, and gain some insights into his experience in apologetics on the internet. So thanks for speaking with me today, Matt.
MS: No problem Brian.
BA: Now would you mind telling our listeners a little bit more about yourself and how you got into apologetics.
MS: Well, let’s see. I’m 53 years old and I went to a Lutheran college and a Presbyterian seminary and I was a Pastor in the Presbyterian Church in America, Assistant Pastor in the CRC (the Christian Reformed Church). I’m a Five Point Calvinist, if that matters; it doesn’t really to me. Let’s see – I have a wife and kids and live in Idaho. I can tell you how tall I am but I don’t think that is going to be relevant.
BA: Now what got you started into doing apologetics and how did you get started with CARM and starting that ministry online.
Showing posts with label Transcendental Argument. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transcendental Argument. Show all posts
Thursday, July 24, 2014
Matt Slick Interview Transcript
Topics:
apologetics
,
Interview Transcripts
,
Matt Slick
,
Transcendental Argument
Friday, September 18, 2009
Argument from the Existence of Necessary Truths
This continues the series of weekly posts dealing with some basic theistic arguments. The purpose here is to introduce the reader to the idea behind each argument. Strengths and weaknesses will be presented after each summary. These are only summaries and springboards for further study in the theistic arguments. See Reason for the Hope Within for more.An Argument from the Existence of Necessary Truths
Humans are capable of apprehending necessary truths, propositions like "2+2=4" and "No proposition can be both true and false at the same time." These truths would be true, however, even if no human existed, indeed, even if no physical thing existed at all. But no proposition could exist without a mind to entertain it, so there must be a mind (God) that necessarily exists.
Greatest Strength: The truths of logic and mathematics seem to be true in a way that is independent of both what humans think and even practical facts about the makeup of the universe.
Greatest Weakness: Confidence in the existence of mind-independent objective truth (let alone necessary truth) is currently declining.1
1 William C. Davis, Reason for the Hope Within (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdman's Publishing Co., 1999), p. 33.
Topics:
apologetics
,
Theism
,
Theistic Arguments
,
Transcendental Argument
Friday, July 03, 2009
The Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God MP3 Audio
Apologist Matt Slick of the CARM apologetics website presents an 8 minute exposition on the Transcendental Argument for the Existence of God (TAG). He will be happy to discuss this argument with you on his radio program!Full MP3 Audio here.
[HT: Operation513 blog and Apologetic Front]
Enjoy.
Topics:
apologetics
,
Atheism
,
audio
,
existence of God
,
Matt Slick
,
mp3
,
Transcendental Argument
Friday, June 20, 2008
Featured Website: Proof That God Exists
ProofThatGodExists.org is an interesting site that presents a transcendental argument for the existence of God. If you check the site out, take time to read through each page -- don't skip ahead -- otherwise you'll be missing the whole argument.Enjoy.
Topics:
Featured Website
,
Transcendental Argument











