This test asks you to answer 11 questions about God, the universe and people, and from these answers estimates the the strength with which you believe that God exists, using an established probability calculation known as Bayesian probability. This test can't tell you the objective truth, but it can help you understand the implications of your personal opinions.
Take the test here. The shorter version is here.
Enjoy.
Thursday, March 05, 2009
The Probability of God Test
Topics:
apologetics
,
Bayesian probability
,
existence of God
,
Featured Website
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
March
(28)
- Featured Website: Biblical Training
- Apologetics Lectures by Ronald Nash MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: Ravi Zacharias on Rejecting God
- Book Review: The End of Reason by Ravi Zacharias
- What Philosophers Wish Theologians Knew About Phil...
- Richard Carrier Debate: Craig's Response MP3 Audio
- Featured Website: Wintery Knight Blog
- William Lane Craig vs Shabir Ally MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: Ghandi on Atheism
- Richard Carrier vs William Lane Craig Debate MP3 A...
- 42 Logical Fallacies
- Frederick Copleston vs. Bertrand Russell
- Free Audiobooks Monthly
- Featured Podcast: The Frank Turek Show
- Sunday Quote: On Thinking
- Book Review: Kingdom Triangle by J. P. Moreland
- Masters of Arts in Christian Apologetics Programs
- Featured Website: Critical Thinking Web
- A Case for Life MP3 by Scott Klusendorf
- Gary Habermas's Journey of Skepticism & Doubt MP3 ...
- Why Does Anything at All Exist? MP3 by William Lan...
- Sunday Quote: Francis Bacon on Philosophy
- Book Review: A Little Primer on Humble Apologetics...
- Logical Fallacies by Michael Ramsden MP3
- The Probability of God Test
- John Lennox on "God of the Gaps"
- Two MP3 Talks on Atheism
- Persuasive Evangelism - Apologetics MP3 Audio
-
▼
March
(28)
5 comments :
Brian
Thanks so much for noticing my test and linking to it. I'd be interested to get, either here or on my website, and feedback you and your readers may have.
Did the result make sense to you? Was the test easy to understand and to complete? Did it raise any interesting questions in your mind? If you did both tests, which one was best?
Thanks.
Not good questions - many assume an answer before asking and force a particular response when the answer is probably 'other'
Actually... it is worse than that.
For example
"If there is no God, how likely is it that we would not see him?"
Ugh?
If there is no God (this being a statement of fact in the given question), it is 100% certain we will not see him - however, this is not to say that God does not exist.
So the question makes no sense to me...
The questions on the shorter test seemed fair to me. Some of the questions on the longer test on the non-god side were a little fuzzy - but other than that it was fine.
I like the point that you made that the results are simply based upon the beliefs of the person taking the test.
I took the shorter one. It was good.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.