Cumulative Case Arguments: Arguments for the existence of God (or some other complex claim) that do not consist of a single decisive argument but rather try to show that God's existence makes more sense than any alternative hypothesis in light of all the available evidence.
Richard Swinburne, for example, presented a large number of arguments, none of which has decisive force. But since each argument has some evidential force, the cumulative case is alleged to make the existence of God probable.
1
1. C.Stephen Evans, Pocket Dictionary of Apologetics & Philosophy of Religion
(Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002), p. 30.
1 comments :
Ah Swinburne. I never know whether I like the way he does apologetics or hate it.
I really like the use of cumulative case arguments in such works as the Blackwell Companion for Natural Theology (specifically the argument from religious experience).
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.