Falsifiability: In opposition to the verification criterion of the logical positivists, Austrian-born philosopher Karl Popper (1902–1994) defended the idea of falsifiability. According to Popper's falsification criterion scientists should develop theories that can be falsified by observation. They should then try to falsify them, and those that survive testing should then be tentatively accepted and regarded as corroborated, that is, as closer to the truth than theories that have been falsified. The criterion was intended to demarcate science from pseudo-science. In the mid-twentieth century these ideas and their consequences for religious beliefs were at the center of the science/religion debate, but because of doubts about whether science itself could satisfy Popper's requirements, issues of falsifiability have had a less prominent place in the debate since the 1980s. 1
Blog Archive
-
▼
2014
(151)
-
▼
March
(14)
- Book Review: The Soul Hypothesis: Investigations i...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/21 - 03/28)
- Terminology Tuesday: Falsifiability
- Book Review: Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism ...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/14 - 03/21)
- Terminology Tuesday: Big Bang Theory
- Book Review: The Message Behind the Movie
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links ( 03/07 - 03/14)
- Terminology Tuesday: Subjectivism & Cultural Relat...
- Book Review: Four Views on the Historical Adam
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (02/28 - 03/07)
- Terminology Tuesday: Verification Theory of Meaning
- Ken Boa on Two Kinds of People
- Review: Reading Genesis 1-2: An Evangelical Conver...
-
▼
March
(14)
0 comments :
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.