William Lane Craig debates Shabir Ally:
"Who is the Real Jesus?"
Full MP3 Audio here.
Enjoy.
Monday, June 30, 2008
William Lane Craig vs Shabir Ally - Who Is The Real Jesus? Debate MP3 Audio
Topics:
apologetics
,
audio
,
debate
,
Islam
,
mp3
,
Shabir Ally
,
William Lane Craig
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(219)
-
▼
June
(17)
- William Lane Craig vs Shabir Ally - Who Is The Rea...
- Sunday Quote: C.S. Lewis on Atheism
- William Lane Craig and Shabir Ally: What Must I Do...
- Featured Apologetics Resources: Stand to Reason wi...
- Notabe Quote: Benjamin Franklin
- William Lane Craig vs Peter Slezak Debate MP3 Audio
- Is God Necessary for Morality? William Lane Craig ...
- William Lane Craig and Bill Cooke Debate MP3 Audio...
- Bart Ehrman vs. Michael Licona - Resurrection Deba...
- Featured Website: BeThinking.org
- Featured Website: Proof That God Exists
- Featured Podcast: The Skeptical Christian Podcast
- Can We Know Anything Accurately About Jesus? - Cra...
- The God Delusion Debate: Alister McGrath vs. Richa...
- Gary Habermas and Kenneth Humphreys Resurrection D...
- What is Apologetics? MP3 Audio by Greg Pritchard
- Dawkins Lennox Debate Video
-
▼
June
(17)
1 comments :
Great debate! I believe Dr. Craig is one of the best speakers on the subject. But one cannot entirely rely on the historical evidences when talking about religion. Like Mr. Ally has mentioned, history may prove that Jesus was put on the cross, but it cannot prove that he resurrected. Neither can history prove, for instance, that Jesus was born without a father, etc. So, Dr. Craig needs to use more of theological proofs in his debates, in which Mr. Ally seems to be very well versed. At least everything what Mr. Ally was talking about, theologically made a lot of sense to me. And again what shocked me, was that Dr. Craig did not object to what Mr. Ally was saying about the Bible. That it contradicts itself, that it is not a reliable source at all, etc.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.