Dinesh D'Souza, author of What's So Great About Christianity, debates Dan Barker, president of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, on the topic: Christianity vs. Atheism. This debate is a little different than normal, with a lot of back and forth interaction and questions and answers.
Full MP3 Audio here.
Enjoy.
Saturday, November 29, 2008
Dinesh D'Souza vs. Dan Barker Debate MP3 Audio
Topics:
audio
,
Dan Barker
,
debate
,
Dinesh D'Souza
,
mp3
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(219)
-
▼
November
(29)
- Sunday Quote on Apologetics
- Dinesh D'Souza vs. Dan Barker Debate MP3 Audio
- John Lennox Video Interviews
- Is the New Testament Reliable? PDF Download
- Phil Fernandes vs Jim Corbett Debate MP3 Audio: Th...
- Using Your Doubts to Draw Closer to God by Gary Ha...
- Why I’m Not An Atheist MP3 Audio by Ravi Zacharias
- Sunday Quote: C.S. Lewis on Jesus Christ
- Historical Apologist: Edward John Carnell
- Resurrection Resources Galore
- J.P. Moreland MP3 Audio - The Importance of the Mi...
- Featured Apologetics Podcast: The Theology Program
- Gary Habermas on Infidel Guy Radio Show MP3 Audio
- Christopher Hitchens and Douglas Wilson Debate MP3...
- Sunday Quote: C. S. Lewis on Christianity
- Historical Apologist: John Calvin
- Exploring the Science vs Religion Debate
- Is the Bible Reliable MP3 Audio by John MacArthur
- Making a Case for the Bible MP3 Audio by John MacA...
- Atheist Defense of Intelligent Design
- Featured Podcast: Please Convince Me
- Sunday Quote: Edward John Carnell on Apologetics
- Historical Apologist: Joseph Butler
- A Universe Built for Us - Discover Magazine and th...
- William Lane Craig Comprehensive Debate List
- John MacArthur Sermon Archive FREE
- The Top 5 Questions by Ravi Zacharias and William ...
- Sunday Quote: Charles Spurgeon on a Humble Mind
- The Apologetic Methodology of Blaise Pascal by Dr....
-
▼
November
(29)
4 comments :
In almost every debate my favorite parts are always the cross examination and question and answer portions. Although the description of this debate says there is a lot of back and forth and questions and answers and indeed there is! I was ultimately frustrated with it because of the rigorous time constraints the moderators enforced.
Usually you might listen to a debate and think the participants are being too testy and maybe a little arrogant. In this debate I thought it was the moderators that were somewhat rude. If you're going to have a format like this then make the debate 3 hours long and let the debaters debate!
I agree. It seemed to me that this debate was set up to be a competition of the one-liners. Neither participant was allowed time to develop an argument or defend an attack. This was no weighing of reason - it was a quick sparring match of rhetoric. Unfortunate.
I stopped listening to this "debate" halfway through. You guys weren't kidding when you said the debaters didn't have time to defend their position. The format for the debate was very strange for a debate setting. Only roughly two minutes to answer a question like, "How do you know the Bible is the true revelation?" And then only 45 seconds to rebut your opponent's claim? Geez.
I heard the whole thing. Against my expectation, D'Souza came out stronger. Format was different to a standard debate, but it worked somehow.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.