Philosopher Bruce Little speaks on the topic: God and the existence of evil and suffering. Bruce Little's theodicy book is here.
Session 1 - Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4
Session 2 - Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3
[HT: Reason to Stand]
Thursday, May 14, 2009
God, Evil and Suffering MP3 Audio by Bruce Little
Topics:
apologetics
,
audio
,
Bruce Little
,
mp3
,
Philosophy
,
Problem of Evil
,
suffering
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
May
(30)
- Sunday Quote: Augustine on Faith and Understanding
- Featured Podcast: William Lane Craig's Current Eve...
- Logic Primer 5: Logical Fallacies
- Logic Primer 4: A Look at Language
- Logic Primer 3: Thinking Logically
- Logic Primer 2: The Building Blocks of Logic
- Logic Primer 1: What Is Logic?
- Sunday Quote: Francis Schaeffer on Purpose
- A Basic Logic Primer
- Book Review: Informal Logic by Douglas Walton
- Whatever Happened to Apologetics MP3 Audio
- That's Just Your Interpretation MP3 Interview with...
- Trusting the New Testament MP3 Audio by Dr. Bill Cook
- Book Review: Logic by Gordon Clark
- Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Rights
- Book Review: Nonsense: A Handbook of Logical Falla...
- The Truth About Angels and Demons
- God, Evil and Suffering MP3 Audio by Bruce Little
- How Can a Good God Allow Suffering and Evil? MP3 A...
- Old Earth Young Earth Debate MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: Frederic Kenyon on the New Testament...
- Book Review: Being Logical by D.Q. McInerny
- Lectures on Francis Schaeffer MP3 Audio by Kim Rid...
- John Warwick Montgomery MP3 Audio
- Apologist Profiles by Truthbomb
- Kenneth Samples Apologetics MP3 Audio
- Book Review: Come Let Us Reason by Norman Geisler
- Sunday Quote: A.N. Wilson on Belief
- Book Review: Introduction to Logic by Irving Copi ...
- Featured Podcast: Albert Mohler Program
-
▼
May
(30)
2 comments :
You should read Peter van Inwagen one the Problem of Evil.
In Quam Dilecta (here: http://www.people.umass.edu/jaklocks/Phil383/pvi.htm), he says that when he was an atheist (which was for quite some time), he way swayed by the argument from evil.
And now, he challenges William Roew's incompatibility-premise, which states that theism is incompatible with ungracious evil. Rowe calls this "revolutionary" (or something like this), but van Inwagen's argument is persuasive.
Daniel Howard-Snyder comments on those arguments against incompatibility here:
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~howardd/istheismcompatible.pdf
He disagrees with Hasker for example (I disagree here, I think Hasker has a good obkection), but agrees with van Inwagen.
Definitely worth checking out.
Thanks for the recommendations, Matthew.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.