William Lane Craig debates New Testament scholar Marcus Borg on the topic of the resurrection. Borg's position is that the resurrection is "really true," even though it is not "literally true." Daryl Schmidt and Darrell Bock offer further comments. Also added to the WLC Audio Debate Feed.
Full MP3 Audio here. (2hr 14min)
Enjoy.
Monday, October 12, 2009
William Lane Craig vs. Marcus Borg: The Resurrection MP3 Audio
Topics:
audio
,
debate
,
Marcus Borg
,
mp3
,
resurrection
,
William Lane Craig
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
October
(29)
- How to Speak to an Atheist MP3 Audio by Dinesh D'S...
- Online Apologetics Academy: Interview with Anthony...
- Presuppositional Apologetics Interview with John F...
- C. S. Lewis and the Problem of Pain
- Ethics Course by Ronald Nash MP3 Podcast
- Rediscovering the Historical Jesus MP3 Audio by Wi...
- Sunday Quote: William Booth on Life
- Book Review: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard...
- Theism & Atheism: Points of Tension
- Introduction to Islam Course MP3 Podcast
- Online Apologetics Academy: Athanatos
- Conversational Evangelism MP3 Audio by David Geisler
- Fine-Tuning of the Universe MP3 Audios by Guillerm...
- Sunday Quote: Tillotson on Eternity
- Featured Podcast: Damaris CultureWatch
- Three Good Philosophy Audio Courses
- The Formation of Belief MP3 Audio by Bruce Little
- Dinesh D'Souzas vs. Christopher Hitchens Debate MP...
- William Lane Craig vs. Marcus Borg: The Resurrecti...
- Book Review: Reason for the Hope Within edited by ...
- Argument from Objective, Nonutilitarian Value
- Closer to the Truth Videos
- Michael Licona vs. Bart Ehrman Debate 2009 MP3 Audio
- Is Jesus Man, Myth, Madman, Messiah? MP3 Audio by ...
- William Lane Craig vs. Arif Ahmed: Is Belief in Go...
- Sunday Quote: Kai Nielsen on Theistic Proofs
- Darwin's Dilemma: DVD Review
- Argument from Religious Experience
- Doug Geivett vs. John Shook: Does God Exist? Debat...
-
▼
October
(29)
3 comments :
Borg and Schmidt strike me as two deceptive people. Why don't they just come out and say that they are atheists instead of redefining words to mean what they want them to mean in order to mislead Christians?
Brian, did you know that you can actually order this debate on DVD from Craig's store at Biola?
Here:
http://www.biola.edu/academics/scs/apologetics/wlcstore/video.cfm
Then you were struck wrong Winteryknight. Why would you want them to declare themselves Athiests when they are decidedly theistic? There are over 30,000 brands of Christianity... and a myriad more religions besides. Should all those who do not conform to your interpretation of theism be said to be atheistic? To quote Inigo Montoya "You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means..."
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.