William Lane Craig debates New Testament scholar Marcus Borg on the topic of the resurrection. Borg's position is that the resurrection is "really true," even though it is not "literally true." Daryl Schmidt and Darrell Bock offer further comments. Also added to the WLC Audio Debate Feed.Full MP3 Audio here. (2hr 14min)
Enjoy.
3 comments :
Borg and Schmidt strike me as two deceptive people. Why don't they just come out and say that they are atheists instead of redefining words to mean what they want them to mean in order to mislead Christians?
Brian, did you know that you can actually order this debate on DVD from Craig's store at Biola?
Here:
http://www.biola.edu/academics/scs/apologetics/wlcstore/video.cfm
Then you were struck wrong Winteryknight. Why would you want them to declare themselves Athiests when they are decidedly theistic? There are over 30,000 brands of Christianity... and a myriad more religions besides. Should all those who do not conform to your interpretation of theism be said to be atheistic? To quote Inigo Montoya "You keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means..."
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.