This begins the Apologetics Toolkit series on: Tips for the Apologetic Life. The goal behind this next series of 5 tips is to provide a few ideas on how to take the ideas studied in apologetics and apply them to "real life" situations. What good is knowledge without being able to communicate that knowledge effectively?
Tool #01: Keep it Simple
1. Use simple terms
When in conversation, avoid using specialist language if it is not needed. Don't assume all people know terms like epistemology, ontology, teleology... or apologetics. Use language that the person you are speaking with understands. Don't try to impress; seek to express. Communication that is simple and clear is persuasive. Greg Koukl is a good example of this, as he rarely uses terms that are more complex than necessary.
2. Use stories and illustrations
Jesus used parables, illustrations, and stories to reach the minds and hearts of his hearers. This made his communication memorable, clear, and powerful. This kind of communication works better for most people and takes the complex and puts it into practical terms. Ravi Zacharias is a good example of this, as he uses powerful personal stories and images to communicate ideas that word alone do not express.
3. Own what you are talking about
Perhaps the key to keeping things simple when communicating complex ideas in theology or apologetics is to "own" what you are talking about. To communicate simply, it helps to understand deeply. If you have trouble communicating your ideas in simple terms, it could be a sign that you are just repeating things in the way that you have heard others say it. Spend time making the subject your own by crafting your own illustrations and ways of communicating the subject -- and keep it as simple as possible.
What does this look like in a in everyday life? It looks like this:
You speak clearly and concisely in terms that everyone can understand. You tell your own stories and use illustrations that cause what you are talking about to be memorable and make sense. You seek a deep understanding of your subject and leave a unique imprint through your own fresh perspective.
Why tips do you have for keeping things simple?
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(393)
-
▼
April
(55)
- Essay: Showing Christianity is True by Matthew Fla...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/23 - 04/30)
- Antony Flew Interview Videos by Lee Strobel (w/ MP3)
- Essay: Testing Christianity's Core Truth Claims by...
- Apologetics Toolkit: Tips for the Apologetic Life #02
- Essay: Atheism: A Falsified Hypothesis by Brian Colón
- Evidence for the Resurrection MP3 Audio by William...
- Essay: Christianity Explains Logic by Glenn Hendri...
- Essay: The Gospels Tell Me So by Vocab Malone & Pa...
- Apologist Interview: Mariano Grinbank of TrueFreeT...
- Sunday Quote: Ravi Zacharias on Implications of Be...
- Featured Videos: Jesus: Man, Messiah, or More?
- Essay: Christianity is Objectively True by Marcus ...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/16 - 04/23)
- Featured Resource: Affirming the Bible's Reliabili...
- Essay: The Euthyphro Dichotomy by Mariano Grinbank
- Apologetics Toolkit: Tips for the Apologetic Life #01
- Essay: Christianity Proved by the Nature of the Je...
- Jesus in the New Testament & Beyond MP3 Audio by P...
- Essay: Christianity and Other Ancient Religions by...
- Essay: The Impossible Faith by James Patrick Holding
- Apologist Interview: Jonathan Morrow of ThinkChris...
- Sunday Quote: Anthony Kenny on the Big Bang
- Responding to Arguments Against the Resurrection M...
- Essay: The Historical Event of the Resurrection by...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/09 - 04/16)
- Michael Brown vs. Bart Ehrman Debate: The Problem ...
- Essay: The Facts of the Resurrection by Aaron Brake
- The Resurrection: Fact or Fiction? MP3 Audio by Wi...
- Essay: Making Sense of the Resurrection by Luke Nix
- Apologist Interview: Sarah Ankenman of WomenInApol...
- Antony Flew: February 11, 1923 - April 8, 2010
- Essay: Prophecy and Resurrection by Shelby Cade
- Essay: Cumulative Reasons for Christianity by Chad...
- Historical Reliability of Jesus' Resurrection MP3 ...
- Sunday Quote: Mortimer Adler on the God Question
- Book Review: The Atheist Delusion by Phil Fernandes
- Essay: Orthogonal Complexity by Peter Grice
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/02 - 04/09)
- Historical Apologist Profiles
- Essay: Defrocking the Priests of Scientism by Bob ...
- European Leadership Forum May 22-27, 2010: Eger, H...
- Essay: The Failure of Naturalism by Richard Gerhardt
- Douglas Groothuis Apologetics Course Audio Feed
- Essay: Coherent, Consistent & Livable by Wes Widner
- Craig Evans vs. Bart Ehrman Debate: Does the New T...
- Essay: The Christian Worldview is the Best Explana...
- Apologist Interview: Michael Licona
- Sunday Quote: William Lane Craig on the Resurrection
- Hugh Ross vs. Jason Lisle Debate: Thousands or Bil...
- Essay: Does God Exist? by Tawa Anderson
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/26 - 04/02)
- Is Christianity True? Essay Series Foreword by Chr...
- Is Christianity True? Introduction by Brian Auten
- Essay Series: Is Christianity True?
-
▼
April
(55)
3 comments :
Do you have ideas for an alternative word for "apologetics"? When people ask me what I do with my time, the concise explanation is that I like to study apologetics. But a lot of people don't know that word and I don't want to sound lofty.
I would like ideas on what else to use in the sentence, "I like to study...."
My wife is having to think through this issue at the moment. She wants to begin a discussion group for women along these lines. But "apologetics" can have negative connotations even for many Christians, and a standard attitude seems to be "I'm happy that you like that sort of thing. As for me, I don't feel I need to know everything."
"persuasion" has emerged as the best general purpose alternative, but it doesn't quite fit your purpose.
Although strictly speaking it means a defense, apologetics is broad enough to involve also a positive commendation of what we believe, and indeed the critical, personal aspect that undergirds it, namely having reasons that strengthen our faith.
"Worldviews" is a useful, somewhat similar term. You may have to define it, which may be something you'd like to do. If not, "belief systems" is an alternative that will be readily understood.
"Culture" and "ideology" are also related. "Ideas" relates to ideology but risks being misunderstood as an everyday flash of inspiration ("I see - you want to be an inventor?")
But if you mean to stick with the traditional category, you could simply skip to the definition: "I like to study how to defend Christianity from skeptical challenges."
Hey there Meg,
Sorry I have been busy and haven't a good time to sit to comment. When I pitched the idea for a Reasonable Faith group to our church, I never used the world apologetics. When I advertised it, I never used the word once. I heard someone else refer to it as an apologetics class, which I told him was true, but just call it the Reasonable Faith Group. The reason is simply because the term comes with its own baggage: either its not understood, or it is misunderstood.
At any rate, you might consider talking about it like this...
Defending Christianity, defending the faith, being thoughtful about Christian issues, critically examining Christian truth, contending for the faith, being thoughtful about your convictions, answering the tough questions, examining worldviews, studying Christian defenses, handling tough issues, answering skeptics, discussing your convictions, persuasive evangelism, being thoughtful about the faith, showing Christianity is true, giving good answers, etc.
Maybe some combination of these sorts of things are more self-explanatory and helpful for those who are unfamiliar with apologetics as a discipline. I hope that helps!
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.