"Nothing, absolutely nothing, has a more direct bearing on the moral choices made by individuals or the purposes pursued by society than belief or disbelief in God."1
- Ravi Zacharias
1 Ravi Zacharias, The Real Face of Atheism (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2004), p. 21.
What was last year's post? See here.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
Sunday Quote: Ravi Zacharias on Implications of Belief and Disbelief
Topics:
christianity
,
morality
,
Quotes
,
Ravi Zacharias
,
Theism
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(393)
-
▼
April
(55)
- Essay: Showing Christianity is True by Matthew Fla...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/23 - 04/30)
- Antony Flew Interview Videos by Lee Strobel (w/ MP3)
- Essay: Testing Christianity's Core Truth Claims by...
- Apologetics Toolkit: Tips for the Apologetic Life #02
- Essay: Atheism: A Falsified Hypothesis by Brian Colón
- Evidence for the Resurrection MP3 Audio by William...
- Essay: Christianity Explains Logic by Glenn Hendri...
- Essay: The Gospels Tell Me So by Vocab Malone & Pa...
- Apologist Interview: Mariano Grinbank of TrueFreeT...
- Sunday Quote: Ravi Zacharias on Implications of Be...
- Featured Videos: Jesus: Man, Messiah, or More?
- Essay: Christianity is Objectively True by Marcus ...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/16 - 04/23)
- Featured Resource: Affirming the Bible's Reliabili...
- Essay: The Euthyphro Dichotomy by Mariano Grinbank
- Apologetics Toolkit: Tips for the Apologetic Life #01
- Essay: Christianity Proved by the Nature of the Je...
- Jesus in the New Testament & Beyond MP3 Audio by P...
- Essay: Christianity and Other Ancient Religions by...
- Essay: The Impossible Faith by James Patrick Holding
- Apologist Interview: Jonathan Morrow of ThinkChris...
- Sunday Quote: Anthony Kenny on the Big Bang
- Responding to Arguments Against the Resurrection M...
- Essay: The Historical Event of the Resurrection by...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/09 - 04/16)
- Michael Brown vs. Bart Ehrman Debate: The Problem ...
- Essay: The Facts of the Resurrection by Aaron Brake
- The Resurrection: Fact or Fiction? MP3 Audio by Wi...
- Essay: Making Sense of the Resurrection by Luke Nix
- Apologist Interview: Sarah Ankenman of WomenInApol...
- Antony Flew: February 11, 1923 - April 8, 2010
- Essay: Prophecy and Resurrection by Shelby Cade
- Essay: Cumulative Reasons for Christianity by Chad...
- Historical Reliability of Jesus' Resurrection MP3 ...
- Sunday Quote: Mortimer Adler on the God Question
- Book Review: The Atheist Delusion by Phil Fernandes
- Essay: Orthogonal Complexity by Peter Grice
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/02 - 04/09)
- Historical Apologist Profiles
- Essay: Defrocking the Priests of Scientism by Bob ...
- European Leadership Forum May 22-27, 2010: Eger, H...
- Essay: The Failure of Naturalism by Richard Gerhardt
- Douglas Groothuis Apologetics Course Audio Feed
- Essay: Coherent, Consistent & Livable by Wes Widner
- Craig Evans vs. Bart Ehrman Debate: Does the New T...
- Essay: The Christian Worldview is the Best Explana...
- Apologist Interview: Michael Licona
- Sunday Quote: William Lane Craig on the Resurrection
- Hugh Ross vs. Jason Lisle Debate: Thousands or Bil...
- Essay: Does God Exist? by Tawa Anderson
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/26 - 04/02)
- Is Christianity True? Essay Series Foreword by Chr...
- Is Christianity True? Introduction by Brian Auten
- Essay Series: Is Christianity True?
-
▼
April
(55)
6 comments :
I must say that, even as a theist, that is a bunch of bologna.
Yes, and especially if that belief is in Allah and his desire to kill infidels.
Jaden...Read again what Dr. Zacharias wrote. "Nothing, absolutely nothing, has a more direct bearing"...etc. He is making the absolute statement and using philosophy to the highest order here. If you deny that premise your going to have to show how it's not an Absolute. But to do that you would be using absolutes in order to negate them. It's a contradiction
I think the statement is obviously true. You're belief or disbelief in a moral lawgiver who would hold you morally responsible for your actions seems to be the thing that would most influence your behavior. How could it not?
I am an atheist and I see very few significant moral differences between atheists and theists. Most of those differences are in the realm of sexuality, and even there you have significant overlap.
Most people, no matter their beliefs about God, have some innate moral sense. Conscience, empathy, and social pressures direct what we think is moral.
I'm not arguing here that atheist morality is superior or even justified or anything, just that theists and atheists don't seem to be significantly different morally.
How can we declare any behavior as evil if there is no ultimate authority to whom we must give an account?
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.