"I’ve heard plenty of Christians try to answer the why question by going back to the what. ‘You have to believe because Jesus is the Son of God.’ But that’s answering the why with more what. Increasingly we live in a time in which you can’t avoid the why question. Just giving the what (for example, a vivid gospel presentation) worked in the days when the cultural institutions created an environment in which Christianity just felt true or at least honorable. But in a post-Christendom society, in the marketplace of ideas, you have to explain why this is true, or people will just dismiss it."
– Tim Keller
[HT: Christian Apologetics UK]
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(413)
-
▼
October
(35)
- Apologetics DVD Curriculums
- Terminology Tuesday: Ontology
- Author Interview: Paul Buller
- Phillip E. Johnson on Darwinian Arguments
- Book Review: Christian Apologetics: An Anthology o...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (10/19 - 10/26)
- Lee Strobel Interview Transcript
- 36 Purposes of God in Our Suffering
- Michael Licona & Dale Martin: Did Jesus Physically...
- Terminology Tuesday: Metaphysics
- Apologist Interview: David Marshall
- Tim Keller on the Need for Apologetics
- Book Review: Thinking About Christian Apologetics:...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (10/12 - 10/19)
- Shop at Amazon and Support Apologetics315
- Brian Auten Interviewed on EIE Radio
- 52 Tips for Apologists
- Terminology Tuesday: Inference to the Best Explana...
- Apologist Interview: Douglas Wilson
- Tony Lane on Understanding History
- Book Review: The Grand Weaver by Ravi Zacharias
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (10/05 - 10/12)
- On Guard Apologetics Conference AUDIO
- Debate: Hugh Ross vs. Lewis Wolpert: Is there Evid...
- Mentoring by Greg Koukl: Watch Your Language [MP3]
- Terminology Tuesday: Epistemology
- Apologist Interview: K. Scott Oliphint
- Hudson Taylor on Hardness of Heart
- Book Review: Christian Contours, by Douglas Huffma...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (09/28 - 10/05)
- 10 Great Apps for Reading, Listening, & Study
- Craig Keener Interview on Miracles: Transcript
- Apologetics Canada 2012 Conference Videos (and aud...
- Terminology Tuesday: Theodicy
- Apologist Interview: Craig Parton
-
▼
October
(35)
3 comments :
40 years ago I heard adults answer the why question with "because I have Faith" and leaving it there, now you have to have what amounts to at least a Dual M.A. in Apologetics and Philosophy to hold your own in a discussion about religion. While I love to debate, study, read and write about the "Why" most people don't want to or have the time to get that degree, but I try to encourage everyone to get at least an A.A. and defend your faith not only with your Heart (Faith) but your Mind (Knowledge) its a great feeling to be able to explain my Religious Beliefs and being taken seriously by studying the Bible and why they don't believe, expanding my knowledge base and having more then just "Faith".
As a kid I heard adults answer the "Why" question with "I have Faith". While that used to end a conversation 40 years ago today we need to have a more in depth answer using the Heart (Faith) and Brain (Knowledge). I have heard from many Christians that they don't feel they have the time or want to take the time to learn how to debate and defend their beliefs. It seems today you need an M.A. in Apologetics/Philosophy to do defend your beliefs and feel confidant in yourself. The great news, we have truth on our side and a great number of wonderful bible studies to help us. "Always be ready to give a reasoned defense......" 2 Peter 3:15. We are asked to be ready and it doesn't have to be intimidating but on our own or in a group can be Fun!
And answering the why question is precisely what science cannot do. To me, that represents one of the greatest failings of naturalistic worldview.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.