Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus? This is the transcript of the debate between William Lane Craig and Bart D. Ehrman.Download PDF transcript here.
The audio for the debate can be found here.
Enjoy.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
PDF Download: Craig vs. Ehrman Resurrection Debate Transcript
Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus? This is the transcript of the debate between William Lane Craig and Bart D. Ehrman.Download PDF transcript here.
The audio for the debate can be found here.
Enjoy.
Topics:
Bart Ehrman
,
debate
,
PDF Download
,
resurrection
,
William Lane Craig
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(219)
-
▼
August
(26)
- Sunday Quote: Samuel Johnson on Objections
- Historical Apologist: G.K. Chesterton
- Excellent Theology and Apologetics Audio MP3 Resource
- Featured Podcast: Intelligent Design the Future
- Beyond the Big Bang - William Lane Craig MP3 Audio
- Apologetics Course with Rob Bowman MP3 Audio
- Historical Apologist: C.S. Lewis
- History of Philosophy and Christian Thought - MP3 ...
- Christopher Hitchens Book Review by Paul Manata - ...
- PDF Download: Craig vs. Ehrman Resurrection Debate...
- The Cosmological Argument: An Interview with David...
- Relativism: Interview with Dr. Paul Copan MP3 Audio
- Historical Apologist: William Paley
- Featured Podcast: Unbelievable?
- Radio Interview with Norman Geisler MP3 Audio
- Radio Interview with Dr. Phil Fernandes MP3 Audio
- Radio Interview with Alvin Plantinga MP3 Audio
- Radio Interview with William Lane Craig MP3 Audio
- Gary Habermas: State of the Apologetics Today - MP...
- Historical Apologist: Blaise Pascal
- The Need for Apologetics by Norman Geisler
- Ravi Zacharias MP3 Archive
- The God Delusion & the Human Illusion - MP3 Audio ...
- Historical Jesus vs Historical Muhammed MP3 Audio
- Featured Apologetics Resource: Ravi Zacharias Mini...
- Historical Apologist: St. Augustine
-
▼
August
(26)
2 comments :
Ehrman got owned. He was off his home court and paid dearly. Craig was on point and arguing for the only rational position one could take on the matter of Jesus' Resurrection.
I really didn't understand Bart's presence in this debate. Why? Because he didn't even debate! He made an emotional case of why historians can't make theological conclusions, which is fallacious, and then laughed at Craig's rebuttals. Nice Ehrman. The good thing about this debate is Craig's position was defended quite nicely and the audience was given a good lecture on the evidence for the resurrection of Jesus.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.