"Prophecies. If a single man had written a book foretelling the time and manner of Jesus' coming and Jesus had come in conformity with these prophecies, this would carry infinite weight. But there is much more here. There is a succession of men over a period of 4,000 years, coming consistently and invariably one after the other, to foretell the same coming; there is an entire people proclaiming it, existing for 4,000 years to testify in a body to the certainty they feel about it, from which they cannot be deflected by whatever threats and persecutions they may suffer. This is of a quite different order of importance."
- Blaise Pascal, (Pensees, 332)
Sunday, February 08, 2009
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
February
(28)
- Book Review: Faith in the Age of Reason by Jonatha...
- Alvin Plantinga & Daniel Dennett Debate MP3 Audio
- 5 New Reasons to Believe Podcasts
- Reliability of the Old Testament Documents MP3 Audio
- Plurality of Religions by Paul Copan MP3 Audio
- Greg Koukl Tactics Resources MP3 and Video
- Sunday Quote: Polycarp's Exhortation
- Can The Christian Know?
- Featured Apologetics Web Site: CARM.org
- William Lane Craig vs. James Robert Brown MP3 Audi...
- Kyle Butt vs. Dan Barker Debate MP3 Audio - Does t...
- Greg Koukl's Tactics Blog Tour
- Craig vs. Dicarlo Debate MP3 Audio - Does God Matter?
- Sunday Quote: G.K. Chesterton on Logic
- Book Review: Francis Schaeffer's Trilogy
- Critical Thinking Audio Course
- Logic Audio MP3 Resources
- Edge of Evolution Interview - Michael Behe MP3 Audio
- Greg Koukl's Tactics Blog Tour
- Analysis and Response to Zeitgeist
- Sunday Quote: Pascal on Bible Prophecy
- Book Review: Philosophical Foundations for a Chris...
- Featured Resource: The Theology Program
- Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis MP3
- The Mind and the Heart MP3 Audio
- History of the English Bible - Daniel Wallace MP3 ...
- Gnosticism: Past & Present MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: William Lane Craig on the Ultimate A...
-
▼
February
(28)
2 comments :
Would be helpful to tell us which edition you're referring to here
There are two ways of referencing Pascal's Pensées, based on the first copy and the second copy. The text differences aren't really any different, just the numbering and order of the contents. The 332 reference here is not referring to the page number, but the number of the 'saying' - or however you want to call it. In the other copy, it would be numbered as 710.
So if you want to reference it for a paper or something, you would probably want to quote it like this: (332/710) -- that would refer to the saying number according to both copies.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.