Norman Geisler talks about the many new forms of atheism that exist today. He also presents arguments for theism over atheism.
Full MP3 Audio here.
Original video here.
Enjoy.
Thursday, April 16, 2009
New Atheism by Norman Geisler MP3 Audio
Topics:
apologetics
,
Atheism
,
audio
,
christianity
,
mp3
,
Norman Geisler
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
April
(31)
- James White Critiques Dan Barker's Debates
- The Missing Gospels MP3 Audio Interview
- Scientists, Philosophers, Historians & Apologists ...
- Book Review: A Rulebook for Arguments by Anthony W...
- Sunday Quote: Dallas Willard on Evolution
- Does God Have to Obey the 10 Commandments? - by Gr...
- Todd Friel Interviews Christopher Hitchens MP3 Audio
- Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturali...
- A Brief Historical Critique of the Zeitgeist Movie
- European Leadership Forum One Month Away
- Featured Podcast: Straight Thinking
- Sunday Quote: Os Guinness on Doubt
- Dinesh D'Souza vs. Peter Singer Debate: Can There ...
- Is God Necessary for Morality? William Lane Craig ...
- New Atheism by Norman Geisler MP3 Audio
- A Critique of Bart Ehrman's Jesus Interrupted by B...
- Wayne Grudem's Christian Essentials MP3 Audio Reso...
- Problems of Evil by Douglas Geivett MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: B.B. Warfield on the Resurrection
- Evidence for the Resurrection of Christ by Peter K...
- Easter and the Resurrection MP3 Audio
- Against Materialism by Alvin Plantinga MP3 Audio
- Habermas, Flew & Wright Dialogue MP3 Audio
- Apologetics Teaching Series MP3 Audio
- Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig Debate ...
- Gary Habermas and Tim Keller Audio Interviews
- Sunday Quote: John Stott on the Resurrection
- The Case For Objective Moral Values MP3 Audio by P...
- Dan Barker vs. Douglas Wilson Debate MP3 Audio
- Does the God of Christianity Exist and Does it Mat...
- The Moral Argument for God's Existence MP3 Audio b...
-
▼
April
(31)
8 comments :
Great!
Thanks!!! This is awesome
Apologists like Geisler who make such a strained effort to dismiss evolution are, IMHO, as good for Christianity as the New Atheists are for atheism: both make everyone associated with them look ridiculous.
Eric-
I agree.
Eric-
I don't.
Semper Paratus, do you disagree on scientific grounds or on scriptural grounds (or some combination of the two, which would of course most likely be a scientific rationalization of a scriptural interpretation)?
Christians should 'always be ready' (sorry, couldn't resist!) to abandon interpretations of scripture that are overwhelmingly falsified by modern science. Think Aquinas here, and the unity of truth.
Eric,
If we turn your statement right side up, then we have my position. Accordingly, I offer the following revised version for your consideration:
Christians should 'always be ready' (sorry, I couldn't resist either) to abandon interpretations of modern science that are overwhelmingly falsified by Scripture. Think Sola Scriptura here, and how natural revelation (nota bene: not natural theology) perfectly comports with it.
"Christians should 'always be ready' to abandon interpretations of modern science that are overwhelmingly falsified by Scripture."
Semper paratus, I'm not sure I can think of a scenario in which scripture could, even in principle, falsify an interpretation of a (properly) scientific theory. It can give us fresh ways of looking at the data in a way that doesn't contradict scientific findings (e.g. a Lorentzian conception of Special Relativity with God as a privileges observer), but these will be observationally indistinguishable from rival conceptions. I simply can't see how it could *falsify* an interpretation of some scientific theory.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.