"Perhaps the transformation of the disciples of Jesus is the greatest evidence of all for the resurrection."
- John R. W. Stott
Sunday, April 05, 2009
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
April
(31)
- James White Critiques Dan Barker's Debates
- The Missing Gospels MP3 Audio Interview
- Scientists, Philosophers, Historians & Apologists ...
- Book Review: A Rulebook for Arguments by Anthony W...
- Sunday Quote: Dallas Willard on Evolution
- Does God Have to Obey the 10 Commandments? - by Gr...
- Todd Friel Interviews Christopher Hitchens MP3 Audio
- Plantinga's Evolutionary Argument Against Naturali...
- A Brief Historical Critique of the Zeitgeist Movie
- European Leadership Forum One Month Away
- Featured Podcast: Straight Thinking
- Sunday Quote: Os Guinness on Doubt
- Dinesh D'Souza vs. Peter Singer Debate: Can There ...
- Is God Necessary for Morality? William Lane Craig ...
- New Atheism by Norman Geisler MP3 Audio
- A Critique of Bart Ehrman's Jesus Interrupted by B...
- Wayne Grudem's Christian Essentials MP3 Audio Reso...
- Problems of Evil by Douglas Geivett MP3 Audio
- Sunday Quote: B.B. Warfield on the Resurrection
- Evidence for the Resurrection of Christ by Peter K...
- Easter and the Resurrection MP3 Audio
- Against Materialism by Alvin Plantinga MP3 Audio
- Habermas, Flew & Wright Dialogue MP3 Audio
- Apologetics Teaching Series MP3 Audio
- Christopher Hitchens vs William Lane Craig Debate ...
- Gary Habermas and Tim Keller Audio Interviews
- Sunday Quote: John Stott on the Resurrection
- The Case For Objective Moral Values MP3 Audio by P...
- Dan Barker vs. Douglas Wilson Debate MP3 Audio
- Does the God of Christianity Exist and Does it Mat...
- The Moral Argument for God's Existence MP3 Audio b...
-
▼
April
(31)
2 comments :
Does this same reasoning apply to other religions?
"transformation of disciples = evidence for claims."
Hi there Samuel. Welcome.
That is a good question...
"So does this same reasoning apply to other religions?" Mere change of lifestyle or some sort of radical transformation can happen for many false things. That does not establish the truth of the object of their belief. Sincerity or transformation is not unique to the disciples.
However, what is unique to the disciples of Christ is their being in the position to know whether or not Christ was actually raised. They did not (like other religions) believe in something that they only thought to be true -- they believed in something they were in the position to know was either true or false.
The disciples had been completely defeated by the death of their master. They had nothing to gain by trying to propagate a lie that he was risen -- especially when death could have been verified by checking the tomb for a dead body. Most of these men went to their deaths regarding the claim that Jesus was risen.
Also, consider Paul. He was a persecutor of the church. He was radically transformed into an ardent defender of the faith. The skeptical brother of Jesus (James) was in the position also to know whether or not the resurrection took place. Both of these men were unbelievers previously but were transformed because of what they were able to know to be true by their first-hand account.
So I think that Stott's quote here needs to be understood in the context of:
1. Christ had just died and they were hopeless
2. they had nothing to gain from propagating a lie
3. they were in the position to know the truth and verify it
4. those who previously disbelieved were radically transformed into believers
5. they were all willing to die for what they were in the position to know was true or false.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.