Always walking a thin line between audio sound quality and file size. The original source audio wasn't the best, and then keeping the file size low was a concern. The audio is, in my opinion, not the best, but acceptable for AM speech quality.
I was present at this debate in 2005. Moreland was at his finest and Clancy so much as admitted a loss in the debate but his position is very hard to maintain. He is skeptical of everything. One wonders why he isn't skeptical of his skepticism...
At 1:40:00, Moreland makes very bold claims of miracles. All we have to base them on is his emphatic assurance, which isn't enough for me.
In particular, I was curious about the Vietnam vet whose eye had been destroyed 25 years earlier was restored to perfect sight through prayer. I wonder: why is Moreland wasting his time blathering on making the unsubstantiated claims that any nut might make when he has powerful examples like these? He should be collecting the evidence and convincing the skeptics.
That Moreland says God does miracles means almost nothing to me. That's what they all say. But for miracles to become the consensus view of the scientific community? Now that I would listen to.
Brian Auten is director of Reasonable Faith Belfast and founder of Apologetics 315, a daily online resource helping to equip the next generation of Christian apologists. More...
7 comments :
The audio makes them sound robotic.
Thanks for your feedback.
Always walking a thin line between audio sound quality and file size. The original source audio wasn't the best, and then keeping the file size low was a concern. The audio is, in my opinion, not the best, but acceptable for AM speech quality.
Thanks, Matthew.
thanks so so so so much for posting this! I can't wait to listen to it. thanks again!
I was present at this debate in 2005. Moreland was at his finest and Clancy so much as admitted a loss in the debate but his position is very hard to maintain. He is skeptical of everything. One wonders why he isn't skeptical of his skepticism...
is there a transcript for this debate somewhere?
Merrit,
I am not aware of a transcript. But please let me know if you come across one. Thanks
At 1:40:00, Moreland makes very bold claims of miracles. All we have to base them on is his emphatic assurance, which isn't enough for me.
In particular, I was curious about the Vietnam vet whose eye had been destroyed 25 years earlier was restored to perfect sight through prayer. I wonder: why is Moreland wasting his time blathering on making the unsubstantiated claims that any nut might make when he has powerful examples like these? He should be collecting the evidence and convincing the skeptics.
That Moreland says God does miracles means almost nothing to me. That's what they all say. But for miracles to become the consensus view of the scientific community? Now that I would listen to.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.