"I should be much more afraid of being mistaken and then finding out that Christianity is true than of being mistaken in believing it to be true."
- Blaise Pascal in Pensées (386 /241)
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(336)
-
▼
December
(24)
- Best Bible Reading Plans for 2010
- 2009 Year in Review for Apologetics315
- Apologetics Ministries to Support
- Sunday Quote: Pascal on Being Mistaken
- Merry Christmas from Apologetics 315!
- Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus ...
- Sunday Quote: David M'Intyre on Prayer
- Book Review: God is Great, God is Good edited by W...
- Reconciling Science & Scripture MP3 Audio by J.P. ...
- Great Audios from Unbelievable? in 2009
- Featured Podcast: Knowing the Truth
- Apologist Interview: Randall Niles of AllAboutGod.com
- Sunday Quote: Joe Boot on Priority in Apologetics
- A Brief History of Islam, Buddhism and Hinduism MP...
- How to Argue Like Jesus: Joe Carter MP3 Audio
- The Theological Roots of Modern Science by Henry F...
- Apologist Ken Samples Featured Resources
- Apologist Interview: MaryJo Sharp of Confident Chr...
- Sunday Quote: Adler & VanDoren on Reading
- Book Review: The Elusive God by Paul K. Moser
- Origins of Life Debate MP3 Audio: Meyer, Sternberg...
- Stand to Reason's Top 20 Articles of 2009
- Rhetoric and Christian Persuasion Resources
- Refuting Bart Ehrman's Skepticism MP3 Audio by Phi...
-
▼
December
(24)
6 comments :
Pascal's wager is rubbish.
So in this quote Pascal isn't afraid that he is believing that Christianity is true and might find out he was mistaken and it really was the Muslims who had it right?
Even if Pascal is correct, he is insulting his own god in thinking that we could get away with dishonest belief (isn't God suppose to be all knowing?)
Also, which does he feel is better. Dishonest belief, or honest disbelief?
Very poor, very poor.
Yet, I hear it so often from Christians it is sad they are believing due to fear
Lee
Welcome back, Lee. I hope you had a great Christmas.
As for Pascal's "wager" -- it should not be one's motivation for dishonest belief (which, in Pascal's case it was not); but it should be a good motivation for an honest search for truth. The stakes are too high to treat the God question lightly.
I suppose to someone who knows the Lord the question is mute. To the unbeliever it may be equally mute; but the stakes are high and the statement is true: "It would be better to be a mistaken believer than a mistaken unbeliever.
moot.
Not that I don't respect his wager to a point, but it's too bad that it's what he is known for best. Pascal was so brilliant and had many other great ideas that should be propagated.
Hi Brian,
I hope you had a great Christmas.
I did thanks, weather has been nice and sunny so far – plenty of BBQ’s and will be taking my sons to the beach tomorrow.
Christmas is strange down in Oz :-)
As for Pascal's "wager" -- it should not be one's motivation for dishonest belief (which, in Pascal's case it was not)
I could not question Pascal’s own belief, but his argument is suggesting that I should believe ‘just in case’ which is stupid as I have already said.
This means his argument is weaker than weak.
but it should be a good motivation for an honest search for truth.
His reason for this “honest search” is for all the wrong reasons – it should be for the desire to know the truth, for truths sake – not for fear.
The stakes are too high to treat the God question lightly.
Why do you believe that they are so high? Do you believe because of fear or the desire for Heaven (This is the argument from Pascal isn’t it?)
I like to think I question this topic more than most – if true, the question is the most important one.
However, I’ve seen little reason and even less evidence to believe it is true.
There is more evidence for planets around other stars, dark matter and gravity than there is for the Christian God it would appear – sorry about that. Not for the want of looking
Lee
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.