.) Be sure to check out his other resources at Stand to Reason, as well as his interview here at Apologetics315.Full MP3 Audio here. (40 minutes)
Enjoy.
What was last year's post? See here.
Thursday, June 17, 2010
The Ambassador Approach MP3 Audio by Greg Koukl
.) Be sure to check out his other resources at Stand to Reason, as well as his interview here at Apologetics315.Full MP3 Audio here. (40 minutes)
Enjoy.
What was last year's post? See here.
Topics:
apologetics
,
audio
,
Greg Koukl
,
mp3
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(393)
-
▼
June
(28)
- Apologetics Course Audio/Video via iTunes U
- Apologist Interview: Gary Habermas
- Sunday Quote: Kant on the Bible
- Biola Distance Learning Certificate in Apologetics...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (06/18 - 06/25)
- Resurrection Quiz Game
- Westminster's Apologetics Course on iTunes
- Get a Free Areopagus Journal
- Apologist Interview: Keith Kendrex of Evidence4Faith
- Sunday Quote:Charles Malik on Being Responsible In...
- A Review of the Amazon Kindle
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (06/11 - 06/18)
- Peter S. Williams vs. Peter Cave Debate: Is Belief...
- The Ambassador Approach MP3 Audio by Greg Koukl
- Answering the Tough Questions About Life and God: ...
- Apologist Interview: Paul Copan
- Sunday Quote: J. Sidlow Baxter on Prayer
- The Golden Rule Apologetic by Bob Passantino
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (06/04 - 06/11)
- William Lane Craig vs. Massimo Pigliucci Debate MP3
- Arguments for Theism MP3 Audio by Peter S. Williams
- Defeating Moral Relativism by Francis Beckwith MP3...
- Apologist Interview: James White
- Sunday Quote: Malcolm Muggeridge on Faith
- Michael Licona vs. Richard Carrier Debate: Did Jes...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (05/28 - 06/04)
- Apologetics in Preaching: Panel Discussion MP3 Audio
- Three Helpful Audios on Abortion
-
▼
June
(28)
6 comments :
Whoa! Thanks, Brian! And we actually have a post up from someone who had dinner with Greg and got a fresh insight into theistic evolution, too.
I just posted it here:
http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/a-simple-reponse-to-theistic-evolutionists-by-andrew/
winteryknight,
He clearly creates a false dichotomy between natural and theistic evolution when both are tools God could of used. Why does God need to use one? Why not both at the same time? His simple response is not going to impress many theistic evolutionists.
I think it is possible to reconcile the supposed randomness/undirectedness of theistic evolution and God's design if one accepts that God has middle knowledge. At least if one thinks that there are truly random elements in the process and indeterminism can have effects on anything that is evolutionarily significant. One would just have to postulate that the middle knowledge also covers the counterfactuals of indeterministic events in the same way as it does the counterfactuals of human freedom.
What may appear to be randomness to us is carefully predetermined by God. Of course, middle knowledge is an important element which God used, but doesn't make events indetermined. In a Molinist philosophy events are still determined by God, but God uses his Middle knowledge to protect the free will of his creations and his own character from their evil actions.
during this speech, Koukl repeatedly references talks he gives later in this conference. Are any of those speeches available to Apologetics 315?
Probably the first thing I would direct you to would be this post.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.