
• The Ten Commandments of McAtheism
• Responding to Objections to Miracles (MP3)
• Rationality, Validity, and Soundness
• Darwin vs. Design Event: Oklahoma City
• Understanding atheism
• Science and the Early Church
• Duns Scotus’ Argument for a First Cause
• God and Materialism Conference: April 8-9
• Upcoming apologetics event in Houston
• Scientists Clinging to Blind Faith for All to See
• Jim Wallace and the case-making Christian
• Thinking Critically About Biblical Criticism
• Love Wins
• Gospel Tip Line: Reliability of Anonymous Reports
• What Early Non-Christians Said About Christianity
• Craig Venter denies common descent — Dawkins incredulous
• Two debates on Christianity and history featuring Richard Bauckham
• Walter Bradley explains three scientific arguments for God’s existence
• How should Christians relate with the culture around them?
• Student groups in Canada and the United States seek talented writers
Get these sorts of links and more by following on Twitter.
Or just add this feed to your RSS reader.
2 comments :
No links about Lent?
Interesting link on science and the early church. But that review of Bell's new book is terrible. It's obvious Challies was just combing the text for things he disagreed with. And he's completely unable to appreciate Bell's questioning style of writing. Instead, Challies has rigid boundaries beyond which it seems he can't think, even for a second. He approaches the text already presupposing that Bell is wrong about everything.
Here's a much better review by Greg Boyd:
http://www.gregboyd.org/blog/rob-bell-is-not-a-universalist-and-i-actually-read-love-wins/
P.S. For those interested in the Bell controversy, one of my theology professors has written a helpful blog on 7 things universalism is NOT:
http://texasflood.ca/random-thoughts-on-what-universalism-is-not
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.