The Fallacy Friday Podcast is the weekly audio version of Matthew Flannagan's Fallacy Friday posts over at the MandM blog. Apologetics315 is producing the audio version, released every Friday as well. Subscribe using:
• RSS Feed, or Via iTunes, or one-click.
Today's episode: Ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)
(text | MP3)
Enjoy.
Friday, April 29, 2011
Blog Archive
-
▼
2011
(372)
-
▼
April
(32)
- Book Review: Kingdom of the Cults by Walter Martin
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/22 - 04/29)
- Fallacy Friday: Ad Misericordiam (Appeal to Pity)
- Undesigned Coincidences in the Gospels by Tim McGrew
- You Can't Take the Bible Literally by Dirk Jongkind
- Apologist Interview: Peter Kreeft
- Sunday Quote: Thomas Arnold on the Resurrection
- Resurrection of Jesus: Interview with Gary Habermas
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/15 - 04/22)
- Fallacy Friday: Petitio Principii (Begging the Que...
- Critical Thinking Online Training
- European Leadership Workshops and Seminars Audio
- Apologist Interview: Lee Strobel
- Sunday Quote: Hudson Taylor on Hardness of Heart
- Book Review: Reasoning from the Scriptures with Mu...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/08 - 04/15)
- Fallacy Friday: False Cause & Post Hoc, Ergo Propt...
- The Question of Miracles: Interview with Craig Keener
- Christianity & the Tooth Fairy: John Lennox Audio
- Apologist Interview: Jay Smith
- Sunday Quote: Francis Schaeffer on Morality
- Evidence for the Resurrection with Michael Licona
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/01 - 04/08)
- William Lane Craig vs. Sam Harris Debate Audio
- Fallacy Friday: Division and Composition
- Peter J. Williams Interview on Gospel Reliability
- Robert Bowman Apologetics Audio
- Apologist Interview: Robert M. Bowman
- Sunday Quote: C.S. Lewis on Eternity
- Book Review: World Religions by Warren Matthews
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/25 - 04/01)
- Fallacy Friday: Tu Quoque (But you did it too!)
-
▼
April
(32)
3 comments :
Virtually all apologists are aware of the way emotions can creep into an argument. We are aware of how not to use emotion in an argument. But I never hear an apologist discussing the proper role of emotion in an argument. I think there must be one. After all, we are not only rational beings but also emotional beings. To reduce human arguments to the exchange of rational propositions, or to only mention emotion with a vague reference to "heart factors" seems weak. How might we articulate a Christian philosophy of emotion?
Thoughts?
Jordan,
I am also very interested in that subject. One interview that I think hit on the subject pretty well was one with Joe Carter here. He talks about the proper use of rhetoric.
I also think that someone like Ravi Zacharias is a good one to watch and learn, as he combines strong stories with good logic - he appeals to emotions, but not in a fallacious way. He pulls on the common longings we all have for meaning, purpose, and redemption.
Thanks Brian, I'll check that out. Yes, Ravi comes to mind for me as well.
One area I'm particularly interested in is the relationship between narratives and apologetics. Narratives have an emotional component to them that doesn't seem fallacious, but lends meaning to them.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.