Full Interview MP3 Audio here (26 min)
Enjoy.
Subscribe to the Apologetics 315 Interviews podcast here or in iTunes.
Monday, April 02, 2012
Interview About the 2012 Online Apologetics Conference
Full Interview MP3 Audio here (26 min)
Enjoy.
Subscribe to the Apologetics 315 Interviews podcast here or in iTunes.
Topics:
Anthony Horvath
,
apologetics
,
Apologist Interviews
,
conferences
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(413)
-
▼
April
(33)
- Philosopher Interview: R. Scott Smith
- Michael Green on the Evidence for Christianity
- Book Review: Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reali...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/20 - 04/27)
- Read Along: Chapter 5—How Did the Universe Begin?
- How to Get Apologetics in Your Church 2: Why Apolo...
- William Lane Craig vs Klemens Kappel: Does God Exist?
- Ticket GiveAway: Unbelievable Conference 2012
- Terminology Tuesday: Doxastic Voluntarism
- Philosopher Interview: Robin Collins
- Robert Jenkin on Christian Martyrs
- Book Review: Written on the Heart: The Case for Na...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/13 - 04/20)
- Read Along: Chapter 4—Is Darwinian Evolution the O...
- The Resurrection of Jesus by Tim McGrew
- New Testament Introduction Series by Ben Witherington
- Terminology Tuesday: Testimonium Flavianum
- How to Get Apologetics in Your Church: Series 2
- Greg Koukl on Faith, Reason & Rationality
- Book Review: Excellence: The Character of God and ...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (04/06 - 04/13)
- Read Along: Chapter 3—Are Miracles Possible?
- Debate: William Lane Craig & Peter Atkins: Does Go...
- Terminology Tuesday: Predication
- Apologist Interview: Vocab Malone
- Charles Swindoll on the Resurrection
- Review: Why It Doesn't Matter What You Believe If ...
- Weekly Apologetics Bonus Links (03/30 - 04/06)
- Read Along: Ch2—Are Science and Christianity at Odds?
- Reasons to Believe Conference: London 2012
- Terminology Tuesday: Properly Basic Beliefs
- Interview About the 2012 Online Apologetics Confer...
- John Milliken on Apologetics and Story
-
▼
April
(33)
2 comments :
I am intrigued at the idea of using the form of story to express a Scriptural truth over against using some heavy philosophical argument that could sometimes confuse one or only work to make the issue more obscure.
I appreciate the references to Chesterton, Lewis, and O'Connor as strong voices for expressing apologetical points. Sometimes I thin the Christian genre is too tranparent. Now that I think that Calvin Miller's Singer-Song-Finale trilogy is poor writing, or that Frank Peretti's This Present Darkness is not riveting (and don't get my wife started on Janette Oke or Lauraine Snelling). But they have a "written by Christians for Christians" feel to them.
It is so hard to write these days without being suspected of having a hidden agenda or heavily veiled moral to your story. This conference seems to offer new horizons to getting an idea across without pressing the issue to the painful point.
I am one of the speakers at the conference and I will be discussing some of the current offerings in "Christian speculative fiction" that is Christian fantasy, science fiction, and horror that use apologetics as part of their premises. Thanks for your insight.
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.