Here are this week's recommended apologetics links. Enjoy.• Creatio de Novo
• Debunking Stenger
• A Quote on Prayer
• Logical Fallacies Chart
• Charles Colson, 1931-2012
• The Resurrection Hypothesis
• Apologetics Resources for Kids
• drcraigvideos: the Fall and Rise
• How to Argue and Disagree Amicably
• What is the case for intelligent design?
• Richard Dawkins’ scientific fallacies
• The Mormonism 101 Series by James White
• William Lane Craig's new YouTube Channel
• Seven Ways To Pray for Your Prayer Life
• Combining Internal and External Evidence
• Formulating a Modest Fine-Tuning Argument
• The Real Barrier to Unguided Human Evolution
• Craig Evans on The So-Called Jesus Discovery
• On Guard Conference: July 27 & 28 - Oklahoma
• Dr. John Lennox's Video On God, Science, and Genesis
• Revisiting the Positive Case for Intelligent Design
• Why Every Christian Must Practice Epistemic Humility
• Shermer on Evolutionary Accounts of Ethical Beliefs
• Why are Matthew and Luke's genealogies different?
• Ticket GiveAway: Unbelievable Conference 2012
• A response to those who are skeptical of miracles
• The Resurrection: Fact or Myth? Part 1 (podcast)
• William Lane Craig debates Victor Stenger: Does God Exist?
• Luke Barnes reviews Victor Stenger’s critique of cosmic fine-tuning
• Do objective moral values really exist? Is moral relativism true?
• Interview with Dr. William Lane Craig on the Resurrection of Jesus (video)
• Is the dismissal by asserting “fallacy of personal incredulity” itself a fallacy?
• The Resurrection Argument that Changed a Generation of Scholars (Habermas vid)
• For evidence for Jesus outside the NT: Jesus Outside the New Testament: An Introduction to the Ancient Evidence
• Would you like to help with interview transcription through volunteering or donation?
If so, contact Ap315 here.
Apologetics 315 is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit. Your support is appreciated.
• Shopping via Amazon? If you use this link, a bit of your purchase goes to fund Apologetics 315. Thanks for those of you using the link, as it helps Ap315.
Or just add this feed to your RSS reader.
For daily post links, please follow on Facebook.
2 comments :
These links are always good, and I hate to complain, but with respect to the Logical Fallacy chart (which was done very well, btw), there is one glaring error: he/she asserts that "circular reasoning" is logically incoherent. But that is not actually the case, as what is logically incoherent is impossible to be true. There's nothing inherent in circular reasoning to suggest the entire state of affairs cannot be true. If he/she meant "incoherence" as the colloquial usage, it means it has no meaning. But even within the example, it clearly does have a meaning. Anyway, end rant. :)
Randy,
I love the Logical Fallacy chart you have referred to as well. But I have a question as to one inclusion. That is the Fallacy of the Slippery Slope. It seems to be a recent addition, and I am wondering to the logical rationale to the objection of a simply event becoming the cause of further misfortunes down the line. Is it an objection to any matter of causality, the difficulty of determining a line of cause-effect sequences with any accuracy, or some other reason.
I would love to be schooled on this point. Any ideas?
Post a Comment
Thanks for taking the time to comment. By posting your comment you are agreeing to the comment policy.